<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (6) TMI 39 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41200</link>
    <description>For valuation under Item 34 of the Central Excise Tariff, specialised material handling equipment mounted on a motor vehicle chassis is excluded from assessable value, except for the chassis itself. The tipper mechanism, allied fittings and steel body used for tipping and handling materials were treated as part of that specialised equipment and not as separate includible value. The fact that the vehicle was also capable of transporting loads did not justify adding the excluded equipment back into valuation. On that basis, the value of the specialised equipment, including the steel body, was held not includible and the contrary appellate orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 12:04:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (6) TMI 39 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41200</link>
      <description>For valuation under Item 34 of the Central Excise Tariff, specialised material handling equipment mounted on a motor vehicle chassis is excluded from assessable value, except for the chassis itself. The tipper mechanism, allied fittings and steel body used for tipping and handling materials were treated as part of that specialised equipment and not as separate includible value. The fact that the vehicle was also capable of transporting loads did not justify adding the excluded equipment back into valuation. On that basis, the value of the specialised equipment, including the steel body, was held not includible and the contrary appellate orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>