<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (10) TMI 29 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41190</link>
    <description>Where a tariff item does not specifically define the product, classification must follow its commercial identity and trade understanding. Zinc callots punched from zinc strips were treated as distinct from strips, sheets, or circles, and were sold to battery manufacturers as callots rather than as strips. They were therefore classifiable as zinc manufactures not otherwise specified under Tariff Item 68, not under Tariff Item 26B, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 11:15:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (10) TMI 29 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41190</link>
      <description>Where a tariff item does not specifically define the product, classification must follow its commercial identity and trade understanding. Zinc callots punched from zinc strips were treated as distinct from strips, sheets, or circles, and were sold to battery manufacturers as callots rather than as strips. They were therefore classifiable as zinc manufactures not otherwise specified under Tariff Item 68, not under Tariff Item 26B, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>