<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Surrendered During Survey Not Unexplained Under Section 115BBE As AO Found It From Regular Business</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85672</link>
    <description>ITAT overturned PCIT&#039;s revision order under s.263 regarding treatment of income surrendered during survey. The tribunal found AO had conducted proper inquiry into excess cosmetics stock discovered during survey. AO accepted assessee&#039;s explanation that undisclosed income arose from regular business transactions, not unexplained investments. Assessee demonstrated excess stock valued at cost was Rs.17 lakhs, not Rs.50 lakhs claimed. Since AO took a legally plausible view after adequate verification that s.115BBE was inapplicable, and no evidence existed of income from sources besides cosmetics business, PCIT&#039;s revision jurisdiction was unjustified. The original assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue interests. Appeal allowed in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Surrendered During Survey Not Unexplained Under Section 115BBE As AO Found It From Regular Business</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85672</link>
      <description>ITAT overturned PCIT&#039;s revision order under s.263 regarding treatment of income surrendered during survey. The tribunal found AO had conducted proper inquiry into excess cosmetics stock discovered during survey. AO accepted assessee&#039;s explanation that undisclosed income arose from regular business transactions, not unexplained investments. Assessee demonstrated excess stock valued at cost was Rs.17 lakhs, not Rs.50 lakhs claimed. Since AO took a legally plausible view after adequate verification that s.115BBE was inapplicable, and no evidence existed of income from sources besides cosmetics business, PCIT&#039;s revision jurisdiction was unjustified. The original assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue interests. Appeal allowed in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>