https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765867 The insured truck's National Permit remained valid on the date of the fire, because the permit was in force until 13.10.2017 and the incident occurred in Bihar on 08.06.2014, where the additional authorisation fee was not relevant. On that basis, absence of the fee did not invalidate the permit or defeat indemnity under the policy. Repudiation for want of a valid permit was therefore unjustified, and interest was payable on the delayed claim amount from the date of the complaint until realisation. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765867 The insured truck's National Permit remained valid on the date of the fire, because the permit was in force until 13.10.2017 and the incident occurred in Bihar on 08.06.2014, where the additional authorisation fee was not relevant. On that basis, absence of the fee did not invalidate the permit or defeat indemnity under the policy. Repudiation for want of a valid permit was therefore unjustified, and interest was payable on the delayed claim amount from the date of the complaint until realisation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765867