https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765888 The appeal raised substantial questions on the Appellate Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 129DD of the Customs Act, 1962 and whether gold was correctly treated as prohibited goods under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. In light of those jurisdictional and classification issues, interim interference was considered appropriate pending final determination of the appeal, and the impugned order was stayed during the appeal. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765888 The appeal raised substantial questions on the Appellate Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 129DD of the Customs Act, 1962 and whether gold was correctly treated as prohibited goods under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. In light of those jurisdictional and classification issues, interim interference was considered appropriate pending final determination of the appeal, and the impugned order was stayed during the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765888