<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765897</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that section 50 provisions were inapplicable to trademark sales acquired before 01/04/1998. The assessee acquired trademarks in 1992-93 and 1997-98, prior to Finance Act 1998 amendments that included intangible assets in depreciation blocks. Since no depreciation was claimed on these pre-1998 intangible assets, section 50 conditions weren&#039;t satisfied. The tribunal allowed the appeal, treating gains as long-term capital gains instead of short-term capital gains as determined by lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765897</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that section 50 provisions were inapplicable to trademark sales acquired before 01/04/1998. The assessee acquired trademarks in 1992-93 and 1997-98, prior to Finance Act 1998 amendments that included intangible assets in depreciation blocks. Since no depreciation was claimed on these pre-1998 intangible assets, section 50 conditions weren&#039;t satisfied. The tribunal allowed the appeal, treating gains as long-term capital gains instead of short-term capital gains as determined by lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>