<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 450 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765904</link>
    <description>The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the assessment order and rectification order rather than continue in writ jurisdiction. The writ petitions were disposed of with liberty to challenge the impugned orders before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) within 30 days, preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to seek appellate review within that period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 450 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765904</link>
      <description>The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the assessment order and rectification order rather than continue in writ jurisdiction. The writ petitions were disposed of with liberty to challenge the impugned orders before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) within 30 days, preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to seek appellate review within that period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>