<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765910</link>
    <description>In an income-tax appeal under Section 260A, the Delhi HC noted that the issues were already covered by an earlier coordinate bench decision involving the same parties and similar questions. On that basis, the questions raised were treated as no longer res integra, and no substantial question of law survived for consideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed as unmerited, and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765910</link>
      <description>In an income-tax appeal under Section 260A, the Delhi HC noted that the issues were already covered by an earlier coordinate bench decision involving the same parties and similar questions. On that basis, the questions raised were treated as no longer res integra, and no substantial question of law survived for consideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed as unmerited, and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>