<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1367 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460697</link>
    <description>Stamp duty valuation must be determined by reference to the land&#039;s actual character on the date of execution of the sale deed, not by its possible future residential use. Where the instrument covered agricultural land, the Collector could not base market value on adjacent land that had been converted for residential purposes or on the purchaser&#039;s intended future conversion. The existing nature of the property was the relevant factor, and a hypothetical future use was not material to stamp valuation. The Collector&#039;s valuation was therefore unsustainable, and the demand for deficient stamp duty and registration charges was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:16:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1367 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460697</link>
      <description>Stamp duty valuation must be determined by reference to the land&#039;s actual character on the date of execution of the sale deed, not by its possible future residential use. Where the instrument covered agricultural land, the Collector could not base market value on adjacent land that had been converted for residential purposes or on the purchaser&#039;s intended future conversion. The existing nature of the property was the relevant factor, and a hypothetical future use was not material to stamp valuation. The Collector&#039;s valuation was therefore unsustainable, and the demand for deficient stamp duty and registration charges was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>