<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 84 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41165</link>
    <description>Carbon black was held to be an inorganic pigment for tariff classification purposes because its essential character placed it within inorganic chemistry, and it could not be brought into the organic pigment entry merely due to use in textile printing. Item 14.I(4a) was confined to organic pigments, so the product did not answer that description and fell instead under the residuary Item 14.I(5). The revision application was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 13:50:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 84 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41165</link>
      <description>Carbon black was held to be an inorganic pigment for tariff classification purposes because its essential character placed it within inorganic chemistry, and it could not be brought into the organic pigment entry merely due to use in textile printing. Item 14.I(4a) was confined to organic pigments, so the product did not answer that description and fell instead under the residuary Item 14.I(5). The revision application was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>