<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2189 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460700</link>
    <description>Use of a transport vehicle in a public place without a valid permit was treated as a fundamental breach of the statutory scheme under the Motor Vehicles Act, because Section 66 permits such use only in accordance with a valid permit or a statutory exception. The Court distinguished absence of permit from other policy-condition breaches and held that principles relating to driving-licence violations do not govern a no-permit case. As the insured failed to prove any valid permit or applicable exception, the insurer was not absolved and the pay-and-recover direction requiring satisfaction of the third-party award first was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:16:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2189 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460700</link>
      <description>Use of a transport vehicle in a public place without a valid permit was treated as a fundamental breach of the statutory scheme under the Motor Vehicles Act, because Section 66 permits such use only in accordance with a valid permit or a statutory exception. The Court distinguished absence of permit from other policy-condition breaches and held that principles relating to driving-licence violations do not govern a no-permit case. As the insured failed to prove any valid permit or applicable exception, the insurer was not absolved and the pay-and-recover direction requiring satisfaction of the third-party award first was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>