<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (5) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460694</link>
    <description>Continuous cohabitation and public treatment as husband and wife may raise a rebuttable presumption of marriage, but that presumption is displaced by contrary circumstances and unreliable proof. The evidence of a formal marriage was found unconvincing, supported by the absence of reliable witnesses, the mother&#039;s contrary evidence, the contents of the will, and other facts inconsistent with the asserted relationship. On the totality of evidence, the claim that Ram Piari was the appellant&#039;s legally wedded wife was not established, and any succession claim based on spousal status therefore could not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:09:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (5) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460694</link>
      <description>Continuous cohabitation and public treatment as husband and wife may raise a rebuttable presumption of marriage, but that presumption is displaced by contrary circumstances and unreliable proof. The evidence of a formal marriage was found unconvincing, supported by the absence of reliable witnesses, the mother&#039;s contrary evidence, the contents of the will, and other facts inconsistent with the asserted relationship. On the totality of evidence, the claim that Ram Piari was the appellant&#039;s legally wedded wife was not established, and any succession claim based on spousal status therefore could not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>