<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (10) TMI 50 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41143</link>
    <description>Calendering with plain rollers was treated as outside the scope of an excisable process under Notification No. 97/73-C.E. dated 16-3-1973, so the process did not attract excise treatment under that notification. The Government also stated that the prior manufacture or processing history of the fabrics was irrelevant to determining whether the notification applied. On that basis, the revision application was allowed and the finding favoured the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:30:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (10) TMI 50 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41143</link>
      <description>Calendering with plain rollers was treated as outside the scope of an excisable process under Notification No. 97/73-C.E. dated 16-3-1973, so the process did not attract excise treatment under that notification. The Government also stated that the prior manufacture or processing history of the fabrics was irrelevant to determining whether the notification applied. On that basis, the revision application was allowed and the finding favoured the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>