<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 387 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765841</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, finding a gross unexplained delay of 220 days in filing and refusing condonation. The court upheld the impugned order and declined to interfere on merits. It noted denial of cross-examination of testing personnel, absence of samples for 17 shipping bills, and that the Tribunal&#039;s remand for verification of Bank Realization Certificates did not alter the conclusion. The appeals were dismissed both for delay and on substantive grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 387 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765841</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, finding a gross unexplained delay of 220 days in filing and refusing condonation. The court upheld the impugned order and declined to interfere on merits. It noted denial of cross-examination of testing personnel, absence of samples for 17 shipping bills, and that the Tribunal&#039;s remand for verification of Bank Realization Certificates did not alter the conclusion. The appeals were dismissed both for delay and on substantive grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>