<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 402 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765856</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal against PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The case involved unaccounted cash purchases of Rs. 5,83,99,000 where AO estimated profit rate on cash transactions without invoking s. 40A(3) disallowance provisions. ITAT held that once AO estimates profit on cash purchases and taxes income accordingly, no further disallowance u/s 40A(3) is permissible. The tribunal cited Amman Steel Allied Industries and noted that when gross profit is estimated on purchases without allowing deductions, s. 40A(3) provisions cannot be invoked. Since AO took a plausible view supported by various HC decisions, PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 was inappropriate per Malabar Industrial precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 402 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765856</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal against PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The case involved unaccounted cash purchases of Rs. 5,83,99,000 where AO estimated profit rate on cash transactions without invoking s. 40A(3) disallowance provisions. ITAT held that once AO estimates profit on cash purchases and taxes income accordingly, no further disallowance u/s 40A(3) is permissible. The tribunal cited Amman Steel Allied Industries and noted that when gross profit is estimated on purchases without allowing deductions, s. 40A(3) provisions cannot be invoked. Since AO took a plausible view supported by various HC decisions, PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 was inappropriate per Malabar Industrial precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>