https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460677 SC set aside HC's decision in retail outlet allotment case. HC erred by adjudicating disputed factual issues under Article 226, which it cannot do. Revenue authorities including District Magistrate reported respondent's land was 800 meters from Giriyama chowk in Falka block, outside Giriyama limits. HC wrongly ignored these official reports and made contrary findings. Under Article 226, HC cannot sit as appellate court over administrative findings or reappreciate evidence unless decision violates fundamental justice principles. Division Bench dismissed appeal on erroneous basis regarding land location. Appeals allowed, HC judgment set aside. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:57:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460677 SC set aside HC's decision in retail outlet allotment case. HC erred by adjudicating disputed factual issues under Article 226, which it cannot do. Revenue authorities including District Magistrate reported respondent's land was 800 meters from Giriyama chowk in Falka block, outside Giriyama limits. HC wrongly ignored these official reports and made contrary findings. Under Article 226, HC cannot sit as appellate court over administrative findings or reappreciate evidence unless decision violates fundamental justice principles. Division Bench dismissed appeal on erroneous basis regarding land location. Appeals allowed, HC judgment set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460677