<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>section 17(2) itc reversal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119567</link>
    <description>If ITC is attributable to hired trucks used for nil-rated supplies, the ITC attributable to those supplies must be apportioned under the applicable apportionment mechanism; if ITC is not attributable, apportionment is not required, but the burden of proof to show non-attribution lies on the supplier, and the owner of the hired truck is not entitled to claim ITC in respect of the supplier&#039;s inputs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 12:47:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 06:40:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>section 17(2) itc reversal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119567</link>
      <description>If ITC is attributable to hired trucks used for nil-rated supplies, the ITC attributable to those supplies must be apportioned under the applicable apportionment mechanism; if ITC is not attributable, apportionment is not required, but the burden of proof to show non-attribution lies on the supplier, and the owner of the hired truck is not entitled to claim ITC in respect of the supplier&#039;s inputs.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 12:47:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>