https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460672 The Supreme Court held that the proved facts did not satisfy the legal requirements of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. On the findings recorded by the courts below, the offence was treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The conviction under Section 302 was therefore set aside and substituted with a conviction under Section 304(1), with consequential reduction of sentence. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Feb 2025 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460672 The Supreme Court held that the proved facts did not satisfy the legal requirements of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. On the findings recorded by the courts below, the offence was treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The conviction under Section 302 was therefore set aside and substituted with a conviction under Section 304(1), with consequential reduction of sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460672