https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460669 Where a tax adjudication order is appealable and no exceptional ground is shown to bypass the statutory remedy, writ interference is ordinarily unwarranted; the Calcutta HC therefore declined to substitute its view for that of the Adjudicating Authority and left the aggrieved party to pursue the appeal. The constitutional challenge to the retrospective amendment to Rule 61 of the WBGST Rules, 2017 was not finally decided at this stage and was kept open for final hearing after exchange of affidavits. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460669 Where a tax adjudication order is appealable and no exceptional ground is shown to bypass the statutory remedy, writ interference is ordinarily unwarranted; the Calcutta HC therefore declined to substitute its view for that of the Adjudicating Authority and left the aggrieved party to pursue the appeal. The constitutional challenge to the retrospective amendment to Rule 61 of the WBGST Rules, 2017 was not finally decided at this stage and was kept open for final hearing after exchange of affidavits. Case-Laws GST Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460669