<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer Entitled to Interest on Refund After Void JDA&#039;s Tax Payment Under Section 244A Despite Revenue&#039;s Objection</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85611</link>
    <description>ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer regarding interest payment under s.244A on tax refund following cancellation of an unregistered Joint Development Agreement (JDA). The tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s contention that delay in claiming refund was attributable to the taxpayer&#039;s conduct. ITAT held that since the unregistered JDA was legally unenforceable as per SC precedent, the original capital gains tax payment arose from a mistake of fact/law. The State cannot be unjustly enriched from an event with no legal standing. The tribunal directed payment of interest from the date of self-assessment tax payment, noting the property was eventually sold to another party with capital gains properly assessed in AY 2019-20.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:50:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:50:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer Entitled to Interest on Refund After Void JDA&#039;s Tax Payment Under Section 244A Despite Revenue&#039;s Objection</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85611</link>
      <description>ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer regarding interest payment under s.244A on tax refund following cancellation of an unregistered Joint Development Agreement (JDA). The tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s contention that delay in claiming refund was attributable to the taxpayer&#039;s conduct. ITAT held that since the unregistered JDA was legally unenforceable as per SC precedent, the original capital gains tax payment arose from a mistake of fact/law. The State cannot be unjustly enriched from an event with no legal standing. The tribunal directed payment of interest from the date of self-assessment tax payment, noting the property was eventually sold to another party with capital gains properly assessed in AY 2019-20.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:50:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>