<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 320 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765774</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that Amendment Notification 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021, which amended Exemption Notification 45/2017-Customs, cannot have retrospective effect from 30.06.2017. The tribunal ruled that under Section 25(4) of the Customs Act, notifications come into force on their issue date unless specifically stated otherwise. Since the Amendment Notification contained no retrospective provision, it became effective only from 19.07.2021. The Commissioner (Appeals) order was set aside and appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 320 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765774</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that Amendment Notification 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021, which amended Exemption Notification 45/2017-Customs, cannot have retrospective effect from 30.06.2017. The tribunal ruled that under Section 25(4) of the Customs Act, notifications come into force on their issue date unless specifically stated otherwise. Since the Amendment Notification contained no retrospective provision, it became effective only from 19.07.2021. The Commissioner (Appeals) order was set aside and appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>