https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765795 The Bombay HC quashed the impugned order dated 30 April 2024 and remanded the matter to the 3rd respondent for fresh consideration. The court directed that all parties be given an opportunity to be heard and that materials produced in the proceedings be considered. The 3rd respondent was instructed to decide the matter expeditiously by passing a reasoned order. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, indicating the court found procedural deficiencies in the original decision-making process that warranted reconsideration rather than a final determination on merits. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765795 The Bombay HC quashed the impugned order dated 30 April 2024 and remanded the matter to the 3rd respondent for fresh consideration. The court directed that all parties be given an opportunity to be heard and that materials produced in the proceedings be considered. The 3rd respondent was instructed to decide the matter expeditiously by passing a reasoned order. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, indicating the court found procedural deficiencies in the original decision-making process that warranted reconsideration rather than a final determination on merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765795