<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 355 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765809</link>
    <description>The adjudicating authority was directed to consider the petitioner&#039;s contention on non-availment of input tax credit and, before deciding the show cause notice, to grant an opportunity of hearing and supply documents relied upon. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, and the time for passing the order was extended accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 355 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765809</link>
      <description>The adjudicating authority was directed to consider the petitioner&#039;s contention on non-availment of input tax credit and, before deciding the show cause notice, to grant an opportunity of hearing and supply documents relied upon. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, and the time for passing the order was extended accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>