<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765817</link>
    <description>The HC quashed an order passed by the tax department for violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner was given insufficient time to file a reply manually or appear for personal hearing, with only 24-48 hours provided through online notices. The court held that when online replies are not clearly visible, the department should grant adequate time and send notices via RPAD rather than relying solely on online portals. The impugned order was deemed arbitrary and illegal as the petitioner&#039;s reply was not properly appreciated. The matter was remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration with proper opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765817</link>
      <description>The HC quashed an order passed by the tax department for violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner was given insufficient time to file a reply manually or appear for personal hearing, with only 24-48 hours provided through online notices. The court held that when online replies are not clearly visible, the department should grant adequate time and send notices via RPAD rather than relying solely on online portals. The impugned order was deemed arbitrary and illegal as the petitioner&#039;s reply was not properly appreciated. The matter was remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration with proper opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>