<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 365 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765819</link>
    <description>HC held that writ petitions challenging show-cause notices under Section 74 CGST/SGST are generally not maintainable, as the proper forum is the adjudicating officer; only in cases of total lack of jurisdiction may the HC exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction. Section 74 procedures and time limits apply, requiring adjudication within five years; the statutory deadline was 8.2.2025 but, due to a seven-day interim stay, the adjudication period was extended to 15.2.2025. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 365 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765819</link>
      <description>HC held that writ petitions challenging show-cause notices under Section 74 CGST/SGST are generally not maintainable, as the proper forum is the adjudicating officer; only in cases of total lack of jurisdiction may the HC exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction. Section 74 procedures and time limits apply, requiring adjudication within five years; the statutory deadline was 8.2.2025 but, due to a seven-day interim stay, the adjudication period was extended to 15.2.2025. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>