<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 36 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41106</link>
    <description>Excise classification of tyres used on dumpers, earthmovers, draglines and excavators turned on the tariff meaning of &quot;motor vehicles&quot; and the commercial description of the goods. The decisive approach was to read the tyres in the tariff context, noting that the relevant definition covered mechanically propelled vehicles adapted for use upon roads and that the tariff also referred to vehicles fitted with earthmoving and similar material-handling equipment. On that basis, tyres used on specialised earthmoving equipment operating on unmade surfaces were treated as tyres for motor vehicles, and the classification proposed by the petitioners was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 36 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41106</link>
      <description>Excise classification of tyres used on dumpers, earthmovers, draglines and excavators turned on the tariff meaning of &quot;motor vehicles&quot; and the commercial description of the goods. The decisive approach was to read the tyres in the tariff context, noting that the relevant definition covered mechanically propelled vehicles adapted for use upon roads and that the tariff also referred to vehicles fitted with earthmoving and similar material-handling equipment. On that basis, tyres used on specialised earthmoving equipment operating on unmade surfaces were treated as tyres for motor vehicles, and the classification proposed by the petitioners was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>