<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1223 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460664</link>
    <description>The HC analyzed Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, regarding tax proceedings delay. Despite Section 73(4B) not being strictly mandatory, the Court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s inaction problematic. The proceedings were terminated due to failure to conclude within the recommended one-year period, emphasizing the legislative intent of procedural expediency. The writ petition was allowed, effectively ending the tax investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1223 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460664</link>
      <description>The HC analyzed Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, regarding tax proceedings delay. Despite Section 73(4B) not being strictly mandatory, the Court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s inaction problematic. The proceedings were terminated due to failure to conclude within the recommended one-year period, emphasizing the legislative intent of procedural expediency. The writ petition was allowed, effectively ending the tax investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>