<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1435 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460651</link>
    <description>Allegations that amounts were recovered during search proceedings by compelling the petitioners to make deposits, despite an asserted undertaking that the deposits were voluntary, were treated as requiring judicial consideration. The HC did not decide the merits of the coercive recovery dispute and instead issued rule, returnable on 1 July 2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1435 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460651</link>
      <description>Allegations that amounts were recovered during search proceedings by compelling the petitioners to make deposits, despite an asserted undertaking that the deposits were voluntary, were treated as requiring judicial consideration. The HC did not decide the merits of the coercive recovery dispute and instead issued rule, returnable on 1 July 2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>