<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (10) TMI 46 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41096</link>
    <description>Skull scrap consisting of material stuck to ladles during tapping and collected from factory floors and open yards was treated as waste rather than remelting scrap. Chemical examination showed predominantly waste material with only limited metallic content, and the material had remained heaped in the factory yard for an extended period before undisputed export. It was therefore not regarded as scrap fit for remelting, and Central Excise duty did not arise on its clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (10) TMI 46 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41096</link>
      <description>Skull scrap consisting of material stuck to ladles during tapping and collected from factory floors and open yards was treated as waste rather than remelting scrap. Chemical examination showed predominantly waste material with only limited metallic content, and the material had remained heaped in the factory yard for an extended period before undisputed export. It was therefore not regarded as scrap fit for remelting, and Central Excise duty did not arise on its clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>