<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Technical Glitch Causing 1 Hour Delay in Tax Audit Upload Deserves Condonation Under Section 119(2)(b)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85581</link>
    <description>HC overturned revenue authority&#039;s rejection of delay condonation for late audit report filing. The delay of 1 hour, 19 minutes, and 16 seconds occurred due to technical difficulties during upload, extending past midnight of the deadline. While petitioner&#039;s technical glitch claims lacked specific proof, HC adopted a pragmatic approach, noting the minimal time overrun occurring in early morning hours would not impede revenue processing. The court found the revenue authority&#039;s order rejecting condonation to be perverse, particularly given the brief duration of delay and circumstances of submission under deadline pressure. Petition granted, delay condoned under s.119(2)(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:12:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:12:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Technical Glitch Causing 1 Hour Delay in Tax Audit Upload Deserves Condonation Under Section 119(2)(b)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85581</link>
      <description>HC overturned revenue authority&#039;s rejection of delay condonation for late audit report filing. The delay of 1 hour, 19 minutes, and 16 seconds occurred due to technical difficulties during upload, extending past midnight of the deadline. While petitioner&#039;s technical glitch claims lacked specific proof, HC adopted a pragmatic approach, noting the minimal time overrun occurring in early morning hours would not impede revenue processing. The court found the revenue authority&#039;s order rejecting condonation to be perverse, particularly given the brief duration of delay and circumstances of submission under deadline pressure. Petition granted, delay condoned under s.119(2)(b).</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:12:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>