<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 278 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765732</link>
    <description>Bombay HC quashed a Show Cause Notice dated 28th March, 2013 due to inordinate delay in adjudication. The court followed precedent from a co-noticee&#039;s case where the SCN was similarly quashed for identical reasons. The petitioner sought to quash the SCN citing excessive delay, and the court disposed of the petition by setting aside the impugned notice, finding no hesitation in applying the same reasoning used in the co-noticee&#039;s successful challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:12:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 278 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765732</link>
      <description>Bombay HC quashed a Show Cause Notice dated 28th March, 2013 due to inordinate delay in adjudication. The court followed precedent from a co-noticee&#039;s case where the SCN was similarly quashed for identical reasons. The petitioner sought to quash the SCN citing excessive delay, and the court disposed of the petition by setting aside the impugned notice, finding no hesitation in applying the same reasoning used in the co-noticee&#039;s successful challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>