https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765750 The Bombay HC set aside an ITAT order for violating natural justice principles. The case involved an ex-parte assessment order passed by NFAC without granting hearing to the petitioner. The HC found that this violation of natural justice continued when ITAT failed to address the procedural defect and proceeded to decide the case on merits despite the original order being passed without hearing the petitioner. The court noted that ITAT did not consider the petitioner's written submissions dated 12 March 2024. Consequently, the HC remanded the matter to ITAT for de novo hearing, directing the tribunal to hear all parties and pass fresh orders on merits. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:12:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765750 The Bombay HC set aside an ITAT order for violating natural justice principles. The case involved an ex-parte assessment order passed by NFAC without granting hearing to the petitioner. The HC found that this violation of natural justice continued when ITAT failed to address the procedural defect and proceeded to decide the case on merits despite the original order being passed without hearing the petitioner. The court noted that ITAT did not consider the petitioner's written submissions dated 12 March 2024. Consequently, the HC remanded the matter to ITAT for de novo hearing, directing the tribunal to hear all parties and pass fresh orders on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765750