<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41086</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the assessable value of goods should be based on the price agreed with the buyer, not the subsequent selling price. It clarified that the parties were not &quot;related persons&quot; under the Act and emphasized the importance of using the factory gate price for excise duty calculation. The court issued a mandamus to cancel the excise authorities&#039; letters and instructed compliance with valuation rules, ensuring excise duty is levied correctly. Costs were granted to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41086</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the assessable value of goods should be based on the price agreed with the buyer, not the subsequent selling price. It clarified that the parties were not &quot;related persons&quot; under the Act and emphasized the importance of using the factory gate price for excise duty calculation. The court issued a mandamus to cancel the excise authorities&#039; letters and instructed compliance with valuation rules, ensuring excise duty is levied correctly. Costs were granted to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>