https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460637 Where the Supreme Court grants leave and expressly agrees with and affirms an earlier judgment, the earlier view and the reasons specifically approved merge into the appellate order. The absence of a detailed speaking judgment does not prevent merger if the superior court clearly records its approval of the reasoning and conclusion below. As a result, the law declared in the affirmed decision binds under Article 141, and the Full Bench could not reopen the correctness of Dr. Vishwajeet Singh after its affirmation in the Supreme Court's order. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 19:19:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460637 Where the Supreme Court grants leave and expressly agrees with and affirms an earlier judgment, the earlier view and the reasons specifically approved merge into the appellate order. The absence of a detailed speaking judgment does not prevent merger if the superior court clearly records its approval of the reasoning and conclusion below. As a result, the law declared in the affirmed decision binds under Article 141, and the Full Bench could not reopen the correctness of Dr. Vishwajeet Singh after its affirmation in the Supreme Court's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460637