<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41084</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, granting their claim for exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 208/77-CE. The court held that the petitioners met the specific conditions outlined in the notification, making them eligible for the exemption. Additionally, the court rejected arguments regarding the manufacturing dispute with the Gramophone Company and the &quot;related persons&quot; allegation, affirming the petitioners&#039; right to the exemption. The court quashed demands and notices from the respondents, granted writs of certiorari and mandamus, and prohibited additional requirements on the petitioners, upholding their exemption claim under the relevant notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 18:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41084</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, granting their claim for exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 208/77-CE. The court held that the petitioners met the specific conditions outlined in the notification, making them eligible for the exemption. Additionally, the court rejected arguments regarding the manufacturing dispute with the Gramophone Company and the &quot;related persons&quot; allegation, affirming the petitioners&#039; right to the exemption. The court quashed demands and notices from the respondents, granted writs of certiorari and mandamus, and prohibited additional requirements on the petitioners, upholding their exemption claim under the relevant notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>