<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1605 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460639</link>
    <description>A two-stage promotion process for Air Vice Marshal posts, involving merit-based shortlisting on annual confidential report and board marks followed by seniority-based allocation against vacancies, was described as consistent with a seniority-cum-merit system. The text states that an employee has no vested right to promotion, only a right to be considered, and that promotion criteria are ordinarily a matter of policy unless shown to be arbitrary, discriminatory, or contrary to Articles 14 and 16. It also notes that a candidate who participates in the process with knowledge of the rules cannot later challenge it after an unsuccessful result, and that superannuation before a vacancy arises does not by itself invalidate the promotion policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 19:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=796148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1605 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460639</link>
      <description>A two-stage promotion process for Air Vice Marshal posts, involving merit-based shortlisting on annual confidential report and board marks followed by seniority-based allocation against vacancies, was described as consistent with a seniority-cum-merit system. The text states that an employee has no vested right to promotion, only a right to be considered, and that promotion criteria are ordinarily a matter of policy unless shown to be arbitrary, discriminatory, or contrary to Articles 14 and 16. It also notes that a candidate who participates in the process with knowledge of the rules cannot later challenge it after an unsuccessful result, and that superannuation before a vacancy arises does not by itself invalidate the promotion policy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>