https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460640 A policy-based amendment to Regulation 101 under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921 was upheld as within the State Government's power under Section 9(4) and not inconsistent with Section 16G, because it governed the mode of filling Class-IV vacancies in aided institutions through outsourcing. The challenge under Article 14 and on minority-institution grounds failed, as aided institutions are bound by lawful conditions attached to aid and the regulation was not shown to be manifestly arbitrary or constitutionally impermissible. Limited relief was nevertheless granted for existing appointees: persons appointed with prior approval were directed to be regularised or confirmed, similarly placed recruits were to continue on the same pay scale, and the financial burden was placed on the institutions. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 11:17:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460640 A policy-based amendment to Regulation 101 under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921 was upheld as within the State Government's power under Section 9(4) and not inconsistent with Section 16G, because it governed the mode of filling Class-IV vacancies in aided institutions through outsourcing. The challenge under Article 14 and on minority-institution grounds failed, as aided institutions are bound by lawful conditions attached to aid and the regulation was not shown to be manifestly arbitrary or constitutionally impermissible. Limited relief was nevertheless granted for existing appointees: persons appointed with prior approval were directed to be regularised or confirmed, similarly placed recruits were to continue on the same pay scale, and the financial burden was placed on the institutions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460640