https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460641 A vaccination policy affecting fundamental rights is subject to judicial review for legality, reasonableness and manifest arbitrariness, even though courts generally defer to executive and expert public-health judgment. Bodily integrity and personal autonomy under Article 21 mean vaccination cannot be physically compelled, and restrictions on unvaccinated persons must satisfy a legitimate public health aim and proportionality. The text also states that trial results and required future data should be published under the clinical-trial framework, but segregated primary trial data need not be disclosed absent a legal mandate. It further notes that adverse-event reporting systems should permit wider self-reporting and that paediatric vaccination policy is ordinarily left to expert consensus. en-us Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:49:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460641 A vaccination policy affecting fundamental rights is subject to judicial review for legality, reasonableness and manifest arbitrariness, even though courts generally defer to executive and expert public-health judgment. Bodily integrity and personal autonomy under Article 21 mean vaccination cannot be physically compelled, and restrictions on unvaccinated persons must satisfy a legitimate public health aim and proportionality. The text also states that trial results and required future data should be published under the clinical-trial framework, but segregated primary trial data need not be disclosed absent a legal mandate. It further notes that adverse-event reporting systems should permit wider self-reporting and that paediatric vaccination policy is ordinarily left to expert consensus. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460641