<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41082</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and show cause notice regarding the classification of products under Tariff Item No. 68 for duty calculation. The matter was remanded for a fresh hearing, emphasizing the importance of evidence and a fair process. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bank guarantee within a specified timeframe, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 18:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41082</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and show cause notice regarding the classification of products under Tariff Item No. 68 for duty calculation. The matter was remanded for a fresh hearing, emphasizing the importance of evidence and a fair process. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bank guarantee within a specified timeframe, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>