https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41078 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Government of India's order and remanding the revision petition for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the necessity of tangible proof and the right to cross-examination in quasi-judicial proceedings. It ruled that the lack of reasons in the government's order deprived the petitioner of effective challenge opportunities, requiring a reasoned decision. The petitioner was awarded costs, including an advocate's fee of Rs. 250. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 May 2010 18:09:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41078 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Government of India's order and remanding the revision petition for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the necessity of tangible proof and the right to cross-examination in quasi-judicial proceedings. It ruled that the lack of reasons in the government's order deprived the petitioner of effective challenge opportunities, requiring a reasoned decision. The petitioner was awarded costs, including an advocate's fee of Rs. 250. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41078