<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (1) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460632</link>
    <description>A State may reorganise Class III health inspector posts into a state-wise cadre and seniority structure, and a prior district-wise provisional seniority list must yield to the revised cadre arrangement. The change does not amount to a prohibited variation of conditions of service under Section 115(7) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 because promotional chances are not themselves conditions of service. A challenge based on mala fides also fails absent specific pleadings or material showing that the reorganisation was adopted only to prejudice one group or benefit another. The state-wise seniority list was therefore upheld as a valid administrative restructuring.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:10:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (1) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460632</link>
      <description>A State may reorganise Class III health inspector posts into a state-wise cadre and seniority structure, and a prior district-wise provisional seniority list must yield to the revised cadre arrangement. The change does not amount to a prohibited variation of conditions of service under Section 115(7) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 because promotional chances are not themselves conditions of service. A challenge based on mala fides also fails absent specific pleadings or material showing that the reorganisation was adopted only to prejudice one group or benefit another. The state-wise seniority list was therefore upheld as a valid administrative restructuring.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>