https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765662 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit maintenance for inputs used in manufacturing dutiable and exempted goods. The tribunal verified appellant's records for December 2013, finding discrepancies where appellant claimed credit against documents they alleged no credit was taken. Appellant failed to provide explanations despite opportunities. The tribunal upheld the requirement for separate records under Rule 6(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and application of Rule 6(3)(i) for non-compliance, confirming demand based on exempted goods value. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:38:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765662 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit maintenance for inputs used in manufacturing dutiable and exempted goods. The tribunal verified appellant's records for December 2013, finding discrepancies where appellant claimed credit against documents they alleged no credit was taken. Appellant failed to provide explanations despite opportunities. The tribunal upheld the requirement for separate records under Rule 6(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and application of Rule 6(3)(i) for non-compliance, confirming demand based on exempted goods value. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765662