<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 217 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765671</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging liquidator&#039;s decision to sell corporate debtor through private sale using Swiss Challenge Mechanism. Court held that anchor bidder has no vested right to insist process completion, citing SC precedent in R.K. Industries. Liquidator properly exercised authority under IBC and 2016 Regulations by adopting Swiss Challenge method and granting Right of First Refusal to OASPL. Stakeholder Consultation Committee endorsed the decision after detailed discussion. NCLAT found Swiss Challenge Mechanism valid, transparent, and consistent with natural justice principles, ruling liquidator acted within statutory jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 217 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765671</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging liquidator&#039;s decision to sell corporate debtor through private sale using Swiss Challenge Mechanism. Court held that anchor bidder has no vested right to insist process completion, citing SC precedent in R.K. Industries. Liquidator properly exercised authority under IBC and 2016 Regulations by adopting Swiss Challenge method and granting Right of First Refusal to OASPL. Stakeholder Consultation Committee endorsed the decision after detailed discussion. NCLAT found Swiss Challenge Mechanism valid, transparent, and consistent with natural justice principles, ruling liquidator acted within statutory jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>