<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 226 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765680</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore held that international transactions for business support services cannot be aggregated with other unconnected transactions when determining ALP under transfer pricing regulations. The tribunal found that transactions must be functionally or economically linked for aggregation purposes. Regarding the Most Appropriate Method, the ITAT noted the assessee failed to adequately demonstrate actual services received despite filing master agreements, invoices, and emails. The tribunal concluded there was insufficient supporting documentation to determine whether the costs represented genuine services or mere shareholder cost allocations. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the TPO for fresh adjudication without prejudice to the current findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 226 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765680</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore held that international transactions for business support services cannot be aggregated with other unconnected transactions when determining ALP under transfer pricing regulations. The tribunal found that transactions must be functionally or economically linked for aggregation purposes. Regarding the Most Appropriate Method, the ITAT noted the assessee failed to adequately demonstrate actual services received despite filing master agreements, invoices, and emails. The tribunal concluded there was insufficient supporting documentation to determine whether the costs represented genuine services or mere shareholder cost allocations. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the TPO for fresh adjudication without prejudice to the current findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>