<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 248 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765702</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an appellate order under Section 107 of the CGST Act was not entertained because an alternative statutory remedy was available under Section 112. The court noted that any issue relating to pre-deposit may be considered by the Tribunal when it arises before it in accordance with law, and the petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 248 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765702</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an appellate order under Section 107 of the CGST Act was not entertained because an alternative statutory remedy was available under Section 112. The court noted that any issue relating to pre-deposit may be considered by the Tribunal when it arises before it in accordance with law, and the petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>