https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460618 A later change in law may justify a successive petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure even after an earlier petition was withdrawn without liberty, because the inherent jurisdiction remains available to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not create an absolute rule of mandatory minimum deposit in every appeal against conviction; although the statute prescribes a general deposit requirement, the appellate court retains limited discretion to waive deposit in a rare and exceptional case, provided reasons are recorded. The clarified legal position leaves the merits of the appeal open. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Feb 2025 18:58:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460618 A later change in law may justify a successive petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure even after an earlier petition was withdrawn without liberty, because the inherent jurisdiction remains available to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not create an absolute rule of mandatory minimum deposit in every appeal against conviction; although the statute prescribes a general deposit requirement, the appellate court retains limited discretion to waive deposit in a rare and exceptional case, provided reasons are recorded. The clarified legal position leaves the merits of the appeal open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460618