https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460614 In disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a finding of other misconduct must be supported by proof of the charges by evidence before the Disciplinary Committee. The complaint and annexures could not be treated as sufficient proof where the complainant did not appear and led no evidence to substantiate the allegations. The respondent's failure to produce defence material did not shift the burden of proving misconduct away from the complainant. The Bombay High Court rejected the disciplinary finding, held that the charge was not proved, and dismissed the complaint. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Feb 2025 18:14:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460614 In disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a finding of other misconduct must be supported by proof of the charges by evidence before the Disciplinary Committee. The complaint and annexures could not be treated as sufficient proof where the complainant did not appear and led no evidence to substantiate the allegations. The respondent's failure to produce defence material did not shift the burden of proving misconduct away from the complainant. The Bombay High Court rejected the disciplinary finding, held that the charge was not proved, and dismissed the complaint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460614