<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1390 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460613</link>
    <description>A commercial agreement for sale of immovable property that expressly fixed a one-year completion period and stated that time was of the essence was enforced according to its terms; the purchaser&#039;s failure to obtain the necessary clearance and complete within time defeated specific performance. Specific performance, being an equitable and discretionary remedy, also required full disclosure of material facts. The purchaser&#039;s failure to disclose that the earnest money had already been returned by cheque before suit was filed amounted to suppression of a material circumstance, which disentitled the purchaser to discretionary relief. The stated ratio is that an express time-essence clause in a commercial sale contract will be given effect, and suppression of material facts bars equitable relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:50:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1390 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460613</link>
      <description>A commercial agreement for sale of immovable property that expressly fixed a one-year completion period and stated that time was of the essence was enforced according to its terms; the purchaser&#039;s failure to obtain the necessary clearance and complete within time defeated specific performance. Specific performance, being an equitable and discretionary remedy, also required full disclosure of material facts. The purchaser&#039;s failure to disclose that the earnest money had already been returned by cheque before suit was filed amounted to suppression of a material circumstance, which disentitled the purchaser to discretionary relief. The stated ratio is that an express time-essence clause in a commercial sale contract will be given effect, and suppression of material facts bars equitable relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>