<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Additions Deleted: Tribunal Rejects Claims of Unaccounted Money Lending, Jewellery and Chit Fund Transactions</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85514</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of multiple additions made against the assessee regarding unaccounted money lending, payments, jewellery, and chit fund transactions. The tribunal found that substantive additions were correctly made in M/s Bulland Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.&#039;s hands, not the assessee&#039;s. Ancestral jewellery was within CBDT prescribed limits. Personal expenditure was justified from own funds without evidence of undisclosed income. Cash balance of Rs. 1,62,000 was properly declared. Payments related to M/s Bulland Leasing and Finance Ltd. for AY 2007-08 couldn&#039;t be added in AY 2011-12. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed due to tax effects below monetary limits per CBDT Circular No.17/2019. All grounds raised by revenue were rejected, ruling in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:42:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Additions Deleted: Tribunal Rejects Claims of Unaccounted Money Lending, Jewellery and Chit Fund Transactions</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85514</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of multiple additions made against the assessee regarding unaccounted money lending, payments, jewellery, and chit fund transactions. The tribunal found that substantive additions were correctly made in M/s Bulland Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.&#039;s hands, not the assessee&#039;s. Ancestral jewellery was within CBDT prescribed limits. Personal expenditure was justified from own funds without evidence of undisclosed income. Cash balance of Rs. 1,62,000 was properly declared. Payments related to M/s Bulland Leasing and Finance Ltd. for AY 2007-08 couldn&#039;t be added in AY 2011-12. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed due to tax effects below monetary limits per CBDT Circular No.17/2019. All grounds raised by revenue were rejected, ruling in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:42:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>