<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 181 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765635</link>
    <description>An ancillary gas compression and dehydration unit that supplied essential raw material through a pipeline to the main manufacturing factory was treated as part of the manufacturing setup for CENVAT purposes. The court found that the Duliajan facility did not produce the final polymers but operated only as a captive, functionally linked plant for the Lepetkata unit, where manufacture was completed. A Revenue circular on CNG dispensing units was held inapplicable because it addressed a different factual context. On that basis, capital goods installed at the ancillary unit qualified for CENVAT credit, and the appellant was entitled to the credit claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 181 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765635</link>
      <description>An ancillary gas compression and dehydration unit that supplied essential raw material through a pipeline to the main manufacturing factory was treated as part of the manufacturing setup for CENVAT purposes. The court found that the Duliajan facility did not produce the final polymers but operated only as a captive, functionally linked plant for the Lepetkata unit, where manufacture was completed. A Revenue circular on CNG dispensing units was held inapplicable because it addressed a different factual context. On that basis, capital goods installed at the ancillary unit qualified for CENVAT credit, and the appellant was entitled to the credit claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>